One weird thing about being an armchair economist is that everything happens so slowly. I’m professionally kind of used to it, but it’s especially apparent these days as the U.S. economy rolls off a cliff in slow mo like a bad 70s car crash movie. Every time you check in it’s a little worse - oh look, there a door came off. And there goes a wheel.
This article from the Times puts it all very clearly: Real estate? Still falling. Jobs? Evaporating. Credit? Still getting tighter. Prices? Going up! But the scary thing is that everyone agrees that things have to get worse, maybe much worse, before housing prices and household credit are at something like normal levels and we can turn around and start building again. My favorite scare line was the estimate that we have enough new houses for the next two and a half years, without building a single new one. (I suspect that this is a deceptive average, and that there is still some demand in New York and Minnesota, to take two places at random, but enough housing stock in Florida and Las Vegas to last approximately forever. Just a guess.)
The Times has been pointing out for a while that not only are we likely to be in a recession, but that the preceding period of expansion wasn’t actually that great: most people’s real incomes have actually been declining since 1991. An earlier article that I lost the URL to said: “For a variety of reasons that economists only partly understand — including technological change and global trade — many workers have received only modest raises in recent years, despite healthy economic growth.” I ain’t no E-conomist, but I think this isn’t actually that tricky. The reason why American workers aren’t getting raises is that technological change and global trade have made it a lot easier to use foreign workers, so jobs are going or are threatening to go overseas, and the real wages of workers worldwide is going up while wages here are stagnating. Or so I thought, and lo and behold How the World Works has just brought out a Goldman Sachs report that agrees. Because I live in one of the places where real wages used to be very low but have been going way up, I tend to see this as a good thing, though of course if you’re an American worker who has been enjoying earning a lot more than pretty much everyone else for the last century or so, it sucks.
Classical economists are on my side, because the winners (Chinese and Indian workers, and of course the global capitalists who are getting them work) could compensate the losers (American workers) and still come out ahead, leaving everyone with more, er, utils. In reality of course this never happens, the winners go to the bank and losers get poor. And if you try and make the winners share a little they whine about global competitiveness. In this case there is a little turnabout at work too, because when American labor was on top how hard did it it work to make capitalists and the US government compensate the rest of the world? That record unfortunately is clear.
And I must be getting old and conservative, because I sense a lot of entitlement loss in America from ordinary people. I read this from Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown from an older How the World Works (quoted in turn from the Nation):
“…There’s a company called American Standard, they make toilets, plumbing fixtures, you’ll see them in near any public restroom anywhere. They’re in Tiffin, Ohio, town of 20,000. They’ve just announced back around 3 months ago, the closing of the plant. It was bought by some investors, they’re moving offshore, they’re honoring the union contract as far as they have to, which is those who already have their 30 years. If you have less than 30 you’re pretty screwed — they give you something, but you can’t get to the 30 years because they close the plant.”
This is hard for the workers and for the town, but “screwed” is a pretty powerful word to use when people are honoring the contract and the worst you can say about them is that they won’t guarantee you the chance to work there for 30 years. 30 years! To me this has the same ring to it as clauses stating how many hogsheads of ale the lord will get from the village, it’s just not credible in the world I see around me.